ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026
Ectomycorrhizal mediation of soil carbon sequestration: from carbon allocation to necromass stabilization and priming effects.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi form the dominant symbiosis in many of the world's forest biomes. They exert a seemingly contradictory influence on soil carbon (C), simultaneously promoting C accrual through necromass inputs and aggregate protection, while also driving C loss via enzymatic priming. This review synthesizes current understanding of these dual roles, focusing on: (1) the magnitude and controls of photosynthetic C allocation from host plants to ECM mycelium; (2) the enzymatic mechanisms of SOM decomposition, the rhizosphere priming effect, and the contested universality of the "Gadgil effect" (competitive suppression of free-living saprotrophs); (3) physical and chemical stabilization pathways including the "microbial carbon pump" (necromass accrual) and "mineral carbon pump" (organo-mineral complexation); (4) environmental controls including nitrogen deposition, climate change, and forest management practices; and (5) prevailing research controversies and key methodological constraints-including isotope dilution, spatial heterogeneity of hyphal networks, and uncertain biomarker conversion factors-in quantifying fungal-mediated C fluxes. We identify key knowledge gaps, notably the need for explicit integration of ECM functional traits into ecosystem C models, resolution of the net balance between priming and stabilization under varying edaphic conditions, and a mechanistic understanding of how global change drivers alter ECM-C relationships. Future research should prioritize multi-scale approaches that integrate molecular omics, high-resolution isotope tracing, and process-based modeling to better constrain the role of ECM fungi in forest soil C sequestration and vulnerability. We further highlight that the ecological significance of ECM fungi in the global carbon cycle extends well beyond the well-studied northern forests, encompassing extensive tropical and Southern Hemisphere ECM systems that are subject to fundamentally different nutrient economies and global change pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.