Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422698›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026

Navigating uncertainty together: a participatory mixed-method study of counseling services for couples living with multiple sclerosis.

Jörn Nielsen, Theresia Krieger, Elke Kalbe, Ann-Kristin Folkerts

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jörn NielsenDepartment of Medical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Gender Studies and Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Theresia KriegerDepartment of Medical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Gender Studies and Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Elke KalbeDepartment of Medical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Gender Studies and Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ann-Kristin FolkertsDepartment of Medical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Gender Studies and Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive neurological disease that affects not only individuals diagnosed but also their partners and relationships. However, couple-based counseling services and couples' preferences regarding such interventions remain insufficiently studied. The PAART study addressed this gap by exploring the counseling needs of couples living with MS and identifying suitable approaches for outpatient counseling services. Methods: This study applied a participatory health research (PHR) approach involving researchers, practitioners, and people living with MS as co-researchers throughout the project. A sequential qualitative design was conducted in two stages: first, expert interviews (EIs) with counselors from German MS Society service centers; second, virtual focus group discussions (FGDs) with couples living with MS. Findings from the interviews informed the focus of the FGDs. Data were analyzed using qualitative deductive-inductive content analysis based on the participatory DEPICT method. Results: Ten counselors participated in the EIs, and four FGDs were conducted with 16 couples recruited nationwide. Both groups emphasized the importance of couple-oriented counseling, particularly around the time of diagnosis, with relationship-related concerns often outweighing disease-specific topics. Communication difficulties and balancing individual and shared needs emerged as central challenges. Counselors additionally highlighted caregiver burden, personal boundaries, and shame. Across both groups, uncertainty about the future was identified as a key theme. Conclusion: Findings from the EIs and FGDs were highly consistent, underscoring the importance of relationship-focused support in addressing present- and future-oriented challenges associated with MS. The results suggest that healthcare professionals should be prepared to address couple dynamics sensitively and effectively. Integrating couple-oriented counseling into outpatient psychosocial and rehabilitation services may strengthen relationship resilience, improve shared coping strategies, and support the long-term well-being of both partners. Clinical trial registration: https://www.drks.de/DRKS00031739, Identifier DRKS00031739.

Indexed as

CounselingMultiple SclerosisAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUncertaintycommunicationcommunity-based participatory researchcounselingcouplesexpert interviewfocus groupsmultiple sclerosisqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42422698
PMCPMC13343353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.