Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422695›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Factor structure and psychometric validation of the Work and Well-being Inventory.

Christine E Garver-Apgar, Zachary Giano, Ashley M Kayser, Chad D Morris

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine E Garver-Apgar *Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Zachary Giano *Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Ashley M KayserDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Chad D MorrisDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study examined psychometric properties of a novel measure of occupational health and wellness - the Work and Well-being Inventory (WWI). Unlike other validated measures of employee well-being, the WWI adopts a holistic, eight-dimension model of wellness, delineates personal wellness from employer-supported wellness, and is straightforward to interpret. Methods: Participants ( Results: The final inventory contains 106 items comprising 16 subscales which can be administered independently of each other (eight "personal" wellness dimensions and eight "employer-supported" wellness dimensions). This model demonstrated good fit to the data and internal consistency. Patterns of correlations between subscales and external measures were consistent with theoretical expectations, supporting both convergent and divergent validity of constructs. Conclusion: The WWI is a validated measure of employee well-being that adopts an "eight dimension" model of wellness. Factor structure and model fit statistics support flexible administration and parsimonious interpretation of eight subscales directly corresponding to eight dimensions of wellness. The instrument has utility for researchers investigating occupational health promotion and organizations seeking to evaluate initiatives designed to improve employee wellness, retention, and workplace culture.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthPsychometricsAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesassessmentemployee well-beingfactor structureinventoryoccupational healthpsychometric validationwellnessworkplace culture

Identifiers

PMID42422695
PMCPMC13342051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.