Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422685›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Support needs, support use and perceived helpfulness of support in a cohort of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a longitudinal survey.

Silvia Goss, Kali Barawi, Eileen Sutton, Rebecca Oates, Kathy Seddon, Stephanie Sivell, Mirella Longo, Alison Penny, Lucy E Selman, Emily Harrop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia GossMarie Curie Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Kali BarawiMarie Curie Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Eileen SuttonPalliative and End of Life Care Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rebecca OatesMarie Curie Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Kathy SeddonMarie Curie Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Stephanie SivellMarie Curie Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Mirella LongoMarie Curie Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Alison PennyNational Bereavement Alliance, London, United Kingdom.
Lucy E SelmanPalliative and End of Life Care Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Emily HarropMarie Curie Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on grief outcomes are well documented. However, less is known about the evolving support needs of people bereaved during this time, what support they used and, crucially, how this support helped (or hindered) their coping, with applicability to contemporary bereavement support contexts. Methods: A longitudinal survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, over four time points: baseline (T1; Results: Findings demonstrate high levels of support needs across multiple domains at baseline, with the highest needs relating to managing grief and feelings surrounding the loss (49.9-59.8% across four items), feelings of anxiety and depression (52.8%) and social isolation and loneliness (52.0%). Support needs decreased over time but persisted for those with indicated PGD. Participants primarily relied on support from family and friends, followed by online community and one-to-one support. Those with indicated PGD engaged with all types of support more frequently, yet a third (35.3%) did not access any formal bereavement or mental health support during the first year. The qualitatively described benefits of different support sources reflected their efficacy in meeting support needs, though inadequacies were highlighted, particularly from friends and family. Support preferences for future bereavements most commonly included family and friends, in-person one-to-one support and self-help resources. Conclusion: Findings illustrate the varied emotional and social support needs of bereaved people and how these can be effectively addressed by informal and formal support types. However, dissatisfaction with support from friends and family and under-utilisation of formal support services amongst high-risk groups suggest significant unmet need and missed opportunities, with important implications for improving social/community support and access to a range of support options which reflect individual needs and preferences.

Indexed as

BereavementCOVID-19Social SupportAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedFemaleGriefHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdombereavementbereavement supportCOVID-19 pandemicgrieflongitudinalsocial supportsupport needs

Identifiers

PMID42422685
PMCPMC13343354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.