ArticleCureus2026
Diagnostic Pitfalls in Obturator Hernia: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obturator hernia is a rare clinical entity that predominantly affects elderly, thin women due to anatomical factors such as a wider pelvis and the loss of preperitoneal fat. Despite its classic description, the preoperative diagnosis remains a major challenge due to its deep location and non-specific presentation as a mechanical small bowel obstruction. This report describes the case of a 66-year-old female whose history of prior abdominal surgeries created a diagnostic bias toward adhesive obstruction, resulting in an initial period of conservative management. The most significant clinical signs were absent, leading to a delay in obtaining advanced imaging. Computed tomography eventually identified a right-sided obturator hernia complicated by intestinal perforation. During emergency laparotomy, fecal peritonitis and a friable ileal loop with multiple perforations were identified, necessitating a significant bowel resection. Due to the gross contamination of the surgical field, the defect was repaired using a primary suture technique to minimize the risk of infection associated with prosthetic materials. The patient's fatal outcome underscores that the prognosis of this condition depends primarily on the timing of the diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention. High clinical suspicion in geriatric patients with intestinal obstruction, even in those with a history of prior surgery, is fundamental to reducing the mortality associated with this condition. The choice of primary repair remains a safe and necessary strategy in the presence of fecal contamination to avoid complex postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.