ArticleCureus2026
Prescription Patterns in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating, systemic inflammatory condition seen worldwide. Prescribing medications is one of the most common interventions in RA treatment. Therefore, we aimed to study the prescription pattern for RA patients at our tertiary care center. Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study of 95 RA patients. Data on demographic profile and drug prescriptions were collected from the prescriptions given by consultants and then analyzed. Results: Most patients were aged 41-60 years (66.3%), and females predominated (61.1%). Common comorbidities included hypertension (21.1%), diabetes (16.8%), and anemia (12.6%). Disease duration was mainly three to five years (55.8%). Nearly half had an education below graduation (49.5%); common occupations were housewives (37.9%) and professionals (32.6%). Disease‑modifying anti‑rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were the most prescribed class (90.5%), followed by nonsteroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 64.2%) and corticosteroids (51.6%); biologics were limited (8.4%). Three‑drug prescriptions were most common (35.8%). Methotrexate was the predominant DMARD (75.8%), while diclofenac (20.0%) and deflazacort (18.9%) were the most frequently used NSAID and corticosteroid, respectively. Conclusion: RA predominantly affects middle‑aged females with moderate disease duration and a notable comorbidity burden. Treatment patterns show strong reliance on conventional DMARDs, particularly methotrexate, with adjunct use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids, while biologics remain underused.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.