Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422642›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Spinal Cord Perfusion Pressure After Resection of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

John Paul G Kolcun, Ryan Kelly, John Otoole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John Paul G KolcunNeurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Ryan KellyNeurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
John OtooleNeurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Surgical resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) involves direct, albeit controlled, trauma to spinal cord tissue. Postoperative management after resection of IMSCTs can include elevated mean arterial pressure (MAP) to augment blood flow to the injured cord. We measured postoperative spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) in five consecutive IMSCT cases and reviewed postoperative hemodynamic management in a continuous, single-surgeon series. Methods This study was conducted at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. All IMSCT patients who underwent surgical resection by the senior author over a 15-year period were reviewed. We reviewed all practices regarding postoperative MAP goals, vasopressor administration, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay. In five consecutive cases, we transduced intrathecal pressure (ITP) via lumbar drain (LD) to calculate SCPP (SCPP = MAP - ITP). Results Thirty-eight patients were reviewed. Twenty-nine patients were managed with postoperative MAP goals (76.3%) for 3.0 ± 1.4 days, with 2.5 ± 1.7 days in the ICU. Twelve patients required pressor administration (31.6%) for 0.9 ± 1.5 days. All patients with SCPP measurement had elevated MAP goals postoperatively, and 4 of 5 required pressor administration. Daily average ITP was normal for the duration of measurement; the highest ITP was measured postoperative days 0 and 1. All patients maintained normal (and significantly elevated) SCPP. Conclusions SCPP is maintained after resection of IMSCT tumors, primarily due to low ITP. Postoperative elevated MAP goals may be unnecessary, so long as normotension is maintained. Future prospective studies with correlated clinical outcomes are needed to confirm this principle.

Indexed as

intramedullary tumorsintrathecal pressuremean arterial pressurespinal cord perfusion pressurespine

Identifiers

PMID42422642
PMCPMC13345322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.