Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422629›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

When Technology Meets Its Limits: Integrating Medical Aid in Dying With Withdrawal of a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Yvette Vieira, Paola Reveco

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yvette VieiraEthics, Academy of Aid in Dying Medicine, San Francisco, USA.
Paola RevecoPalliative Care, Summit Health, Florham Park, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many patients in the United States live with left ventricular assist devices - surgically implanted mechanical pumps that support circulation in individuals with advanced heart failure. The use of these devices has grown steadily, with new implants performed each year and many patients maintained with ongoing longitudinal care. As outcomes improve and patients live longer with this form of mechanical support, clinicians across disciplines are increasingly confronted with the complex clinical, ethical, and practical challenges that arise when life-sustaining therapy is dependent on implanted technology, particularly in the context of end-of-life decision-making. We present a case report of a 76-year-old man with advanced heart failure supported by an implanted cardiac pump. He pursued medical aid in dying - the legal process by which a terminally ill, mentally capable adult may take prescribed medications to end their life. Deactivating a cardiac assist pump typically occurs in a hospital with intravenous sedation for the abrupt heart failure symptoms that can occur when the pump is turned off. But this patient desired to die at home. An end-of-life care navigator and a carefully assembled interdisciplinary team providing medical aid in dying in conjunction with pump deactivation achieved the patient's home death at his selected date. Coordinating implanted cardiac device withdrawal with medical aid in dying is clinically achievable, ethically defensible, and legally sound. Healthcare systems must develop written protocols, train hospice providers, provide anticipatory counseling, fund necessary infrastructure, and support this end-of-life care.

Indexed as

aid in dyingbioethicshealthcare ethicshospice deathleft ventricular assist device(lvad)medical-aid-in-dyingpalliative carephysician-assisted suicidevoluntary assisted dying

Identifiers

PMID42422629
PMCPMC13344083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.