Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422613›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

The Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine as an Adjunct in the Management of Acute Zinc Phosphide Poisoning: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.

Siva K V, Jahnu Bhoj Nagal, Kuldeep Meena, Kavita Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siva K VDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Ajmer, IND.
Jahnu Bhoj NagalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Ajmer, IND.
Kuldeep MeenaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Ajmer, IND.
Kavita JainDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Ajmer, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective Acute zinc phosphide poisoning is a life-threatening toxicological emergency with high mortality, primarily caused by phosphine-induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. In the absence of a specific antidote, identifying effective adjunctive therapies is critical. This study aimed to evaluate whether intravenous N-acetylcysteine (NAC) can improve clinical outcomes when added to standard supportive care. Methods A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a single tertiary care emergency department in Northwest India from April 2024 to March 2025. This trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI/2024/03/064278). Sixty adults (18-70 years) with confirmed zinc phosphide poisoning were randomly assigned to receive either standard supportive care with intravenous NAC (300 mg/kg over 20 hours) or standard care with a 5% dextrose placebo. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Severity at presentation, assessed by the requirement for inotropic support at admission, was also comparable between groups, with nine patients (30.0%) in the NAC group and eight patients (26.7%) in the placebo group requiring inotropic support at baseline (p = 0.83). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included need for vasoactive support at admission and 24 hours, and changes in systolic blood pressure, arterial potential of hydrogen (arterial pH), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme (CK-MB). Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The NAC group showed lower in-hospital mortality than the placebo group (6.7% vs. 20.0%; Fisher's exact p = 0.254; relative risk (RR): 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-1.52; absolute risk reduction (ARR): 13.3%) and reduced requirement for inotropic support at 24 hours (6.7% vs. 23.3%; Fisher's exact p = 0.145; RR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.07-1.27; ARR: 16.6%); however, neither difference reached statistical significance. Serum ALT and AST levels were significantly lower in the NAC group than in the placebo group, with median ALT values of 92 IU/L versus 205 IU/L and median AST values of 48 IU/L versus 150 IU/L, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). No significant differences were observed in arterial pH or CK-MB levels. No adverse effects related to NAC were reported. Conclusions In this preliminary single-center trial, adjunctive intravenous NAC was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in in-hospital mortality or the requirement for inotropic support; however, a clinically meaningful trend was observed. Larger multicenter randomized trials are needed to determine the role of NAC in acute zinc phosphide poisoning.

Indexed as

acute zinc phosphide poisoningin-hospital mortalityn-acetylcysteinerandomized controlled trialvasoactive support

Identifiers

PMID42422613
PMCPMC13343458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.