ArticleCureus2026
Comparison of Wound Outcomes Between Short-Stitch and Long-Stitch Fascial Closure Following Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Emergency exploratory laparotomy is associated with a high incidence of postoperative wound complications, including surgical site infection (SSI) and surgical wound dehiscence (SWD). The fascial closure technique, particularly the stitch length and suture length-to-wound length (SL:WL) ratio, plays a crucial role in wound healing. While short-stitch (SS) techniques have demonstrated superiority in elective surgeries, evidence in emergency settings remains limited. Methods This prospective, observational, comparative study was conducted over 18 months at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Ninety-four patients undergoing emergency midline exploratory laparotomy were allocated into SS (n = 47) and long-stitch (LS; n = 47) groups using simple random allocation. Fascial closure was performed using continuous size 1-0 polydioxanone (PDS) suture. The same surgical team performed all procedures to minimize inter-operator variability. Outcomes assessed included SSI (Southampton grading), SWD (World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS) grading), time-to-fascial closure, postoperative pain (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores), length of hospital stay, and the incidence of incisional hernia. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Overall SSI incidence was significantly lower in the SS group compared to the LS group (10.6% (n = 5/47) vs 27.7% (n = 13/47); p = 0.036). Severe SSI grades were more frequent in the LS group but did not reach statistical significance. SWD incidence was also significantly lower with SS closure (12.8% (n = 6/47) vs 36.2% (n = 17/47); p = 0.016). Mean time-to-fascial closure was significantly longer in the SS group than in the LS group (14.8 ± 4.2 min vs 11.4 ± 2.9 min, p < 0.001). Postoperative pain scores and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion SS fascial closure following emergency exploratory laparotomy is associated with significantly reduced SSI and wound dehiscence, with only a modest increase in closure time. Adoption of this technique may improve postoperative wound outcomes in emergency abdominal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.