ArticleCureus2026
Intrauterine Pregnancy With a Correctly Positioned Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrauterine pregnancy occurring with a correctly positioned levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is extremely rare. Most pregnancies associated with LNG-IUS use result from device malposition, unnoticed expulsion, or insertion during an undiagnosed early pregnancy. Pregnancy with an intrauterine device in situ is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage, preterm delivery, and intra-amniotic infection. We report the case of a 39-year-old gravida 4 para 2 abortus 1 woman with a correctly positioned 52-mg LNG-IUS who presented at 12 weeks' gestation with leakage of amniotic fluid. One week earlier, an ultrasound had confirmed a viable intrauterine pregnancy with correct device positioning in the uterine fundus. Because the IUS strings were not visible on examination, no immediate removal was attempted. The patient wished to continue the pregnancy. During hospitalization, intrauterine fetal demise occurred, followed by pharmacological induction of miscarriage and uterine curettage with device removal. This case highlights the clinical challenges of pregnancy with an LNG-IUS in situ and emphasizes that the lack of visible strings should not preclude consideration of removal. Current evidence suggests that hysteroscopic removal in early pregnancy may reduce adverse outcomes and should be considered in patients wishing to continue pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.