ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2026
Linking biochemical and cellular efficacy of MERS coronavirus main protease inhibitors.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compounds that bind to the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) main protease (MPro) often produce biphasic concentration-response curves (CRCs) in biochemical assays; low concentrations activate the enzyme and high concentrations inhibit it. This biphasic behavior complicates data analysis. Here, we compare three approaches to data analysis: fitting the Hill equation to full inhibition phase, fitting it to the inhibition phase based on the negative control, and fitting an enzyme kinetics model that incorporates dimerization and ligand binding to the complete CRC. In the latter case, cellular efficacy is predicted by extrapolating the model to high enzyme concentrations. For compounds in our drug lead series, all three procedures yield inhibitory concentrations that are correlated with live-virus antiviral assays. The latter procedure provides the most accurate forecast of cellular efficacy rank. These data analysis procedures may be valuable for antiviral drug discovery against MERS-CoV MPro and other enzymes with similar kinetics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.