ArticleAperture neuro2025
Consensus recommendations for clinical functional MRI applied to language mapping.
Article in Aperture neuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cortical gradient in area 55b links language and somato-cognitive action networks.Research square · 2026Article
- Evaluating Unimodal and Multimodal Tracking Strategies for the Reconstruction of Language-related White Matter Tracts.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Face-name associative memory in temporal lobe epilepsy: Region-specific insights in right-hemisphere onset.Epilepsy research · 2026Article
- A Rapid fMRI Paradigm for Localisation of the Language Network.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Relationship between atypical language lateralization and cognition in pediatric patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy: role of working memory.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Separating the forest from the palm trees: Individual variation in a presurgical language mapping task.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Multimodal Imaging in Epilepsy Surgery for Personalized Neurosurgical Planning.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Dynamic neuroplasticity of language networks: The intersection of bilingualism and epilepsy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Multimodal Neuroimaging and Electrophysiological Markers in Multiple Sclerosis: An Integrative Review of fMRI, EEG, and EMG Approaches : fMRI, EEG, EMG in Multiple Sclerosis.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ample reports highlight fMRI's added value to guide neurosurgical interventions near brain regions supporting speech and language. However, fMRI's usefulness for clinical language mapping remains controversial, partly fueled by 1) differences from clinical standard tools it is often compared against, and 2) wide heterogeneity in how data are acquired, analyzed and interpreted. Both factors limit objective assessment of the benefits and efficacy of presurgical fMRI. This underscores the need for standardization of fMRI protocols to enable data pooling across centers and facilitate learning from patient outcomes. The OHBM Working Group on clinical fMRI language mapping was formed in 2017. Its scope was to review and propose best practice recommendations addressing specific challenges posed by applications in patient populations. Objectives were to: 1) consider language tasks and designs, optimized for specific clinical objectives, and incorporating modifications for patients with existing impairments; 2) offer practical guidance, based on high-quality research, for each step from fMRI acquisition and analysis to reporting individual patients' data. In considering these challenges we focus on implementations that have proven feasible based on approaches in active use today. When widely available practices deviate from optimal practices, we highlight emerging developments meriting further evaluation and incorporation into clinical use. This document was created in collaboration with the OHBM Committee on Best Practices, incorporating community feedback. It aims to provide a framework for improved standardization of fMRI to enable much-needed evaluations of its ultimate goals; namely, minimization of invasive intraoperative testing and, ultimately, of new post-operative language deficits. Accordingly, the single strongest recommendation is for greater transparency and reporting of longitudinal outcomes in patients undergoing clinical fMRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.