In one paragraphArticle in ZooKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
22 authors.
Michael J SharkeyThe Hymenoptera Institute, 1100 Pepperhill Circle, Lexington, Kentucky 40502, USA Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia United States of America https://ror.org/00b30xv10.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6201-7340 Marko MutanenEcology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, PO Box 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC United States of America https://ror.org/00cz47042.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-6308 Austin BakerEntomology Section, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA Entomology Section, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Los Angeles United States of America https://ror.org/00p9h0053.
Brian V BrownEntomology Section, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA Entomology Section, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Los Angeles United States of America https://ror.org/00p9h0053.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-6057 Buntika Areekul ButcherCenter of Excellence in Integrative Insect Ecology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Road, Pathumwan, BKK 10330, Thailand Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador Quito Ecuador https://ror.org/010n0x685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0541-0709 Ashley P G DowlingDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701, USA Center of Excellence in Integrative Insect Ecology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University Pathumwan Thailand https://ror.org/028wp3y58.
H Charles J GodfrayDepartment of Biology, Oxford University, South Parks Rd., Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad Quito Ecuador https://ror.org/02veev176.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-7232 Winnie HallwachsDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum London United Kingdom https://ror.org/039zvsn29.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5166-809X Axel HausmannSNSB - Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu Oulu Finland https://ror.org/03yj89h83.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0358-9928 Paul D N HebertCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London Ascot United Kingdom https://ror.org/041kmwe10.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3081-6700 Daniel H JanzenDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum London United Kingdom https://ror.org/039zvsn29.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-5107 Niina KiljunenEcology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, PO Box 8000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC United States of America https://ror.org/00cz47042.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-3254 Scott E MillerNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC 105 Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA Department of Biology, Oxford University Oxford United Kingdom https://ror.org/052gg0110.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4138-1378 Guilherme OliveiraInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Rua Boaventura da Silva 955, Belém, PA, 66055-090, Brazil Department of Biology, York University Toronto Canada https://ror.org/05fq50484.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0054-3438 Laurence PackerDepartment of Biology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario M3J1P3, Canada Instituto Tecnológico Vale Belém Brazil https://ror.org/05wnasr61.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1711-8203 Donald L J QuickeCenter of Excellence in Integrative Insect Ecology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Road, Pathumwan, BKK 10330, Thailand Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador Quito Ecuador https://ror.org/010n0x685.
Jeffrey H Skevington146 Monty Drive, Ottawa, ON, K0A3M0, Canada Department of Natural History, University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway https://ror.org/05xg72x27.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1445-9870 Dirk SteinkeCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London Ascot United Kingdom https://ror.org/041kmwe10.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8992-575X José A Hernández UgaldeTechnical Area, National Commission for Biodiversity Management, C. 9 y 11Avenida 21, San José, Costa Rica The Hymenoptera Institute Lexington United States of America.
Alfried P VoglerDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas Fayetteville United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2462-3718 Emily HartopDepartment of Natural History, University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7012 Trondheim, Norway Technical Area, National Commission for Biodiversity Management San José Costa Rica.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8598-9844 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Species descriptions remain the foundation of biodiversity science, but alpha taxonomy faces a twofold challenge: accelerating the pace of species discovery while ensuring that descriptions produce data that are usable, comparable, and reproducible. This is particularly acute for "dark taxa"-small, hyperdiverse, and morphologically challenging groups-for which morphology-based workflows alone often fail to deliver scalable and reliable identifications. As a result, most species remain undescribed, and many described species are difficult or impossible to identify. We argue that species descriptions must be integrative in a way that meets the practical requirements of modern taxonomy, including scalability, reliable identification, reproducibility, and applicability across life stages. At present, standardized molecular data in the form of DNA barcoding is the only approach that consistently satisfies these criteria. Emerging approaches based on robotics, imaging and artificial intelligence may eventually provide complementary frameworks, but currently lack the standardization and interoperability required for routine application at scale. In contrast, barcode data already enable high-throughput species delimitation, straightforward identification, and direct comparability across studies, supported by global reference libraries and standardized protocols. We therefore propose that DNA barcodes be treated as a baseline component of species descriptions for invertebrates. Standardizing molecular data in taxonomy will accelerate species discovery, improve reproducibility and stability, and ensure that newly described taxa remain accessible in an increasingly DNA-based research landscape.
Indexed as
COIDNA barcodeintegrative taxonomytaxonomic impediment
Identifiers
PMID42422546
PMCPMC13342927
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390