ArticleClinical epidemiology and global health
Perspectives of cardiac care providers on the continuum of care among women with cardiovascular disease in a tertiary care hospital of South India.
Article in Clinical epidemiology and global health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality among women, and the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare continuity. This research explores healthcare providers' (HCPs) perspectives on challenges in providing cardiac care to women during the pandemic. Methods: A qualitative inquiry was conducted through in-depth interviews among 11 HCPs at a tertiary care hospital in South India. Results: The thematic analysis revealed several concepts. Women with CVD were less health literate and often presented late. They relied on family support for care continuity. Family decision-making, pandemic restrictions, and personal hesitancy delayed care-seeking. Women faced lower prioritization within families and depended on male members for healthcare decisions. This reflects societal and cultural gender disparities. Organized services were present, but long waiting periods and rushed consultations, especially during follow-up visits, affected satisfaction and continuity of care. Language barriers and low literacy hindered doctor-patient communication. HCPs tried to learn the local language to improve interactions. Access to health-financing mechanisms and social support networks helped treatment compliance. During the second wave, heightened health consciousness led more women to seek care. However, strained resources caused rushed care and limited patient-HCP interactions. Conclusion: The study highlights gender-specific challenges that affect women's access to and continuation of cardiac care. Pragmatic measures should aim to increase the doctor-patient ratio to reduce rushed consultations. Employing counselors or social workers can also help bridge communication and cultural gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.