ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Suicidal and self-harm behaviors in emergency psychiatry: bridging risk assessment and clinical decision-making.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) represent major clinical challenges in psychiatric emergency settings. Despite extensive research on risk factors, the prediction and management of suicidal behavior remain complex, often requiring rapid decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Objective: To provide a practical, clinically grounded framework for the assessment and management of suicidal and self-harm behaviors in emergency settings, integrating current evidence with real-world clinical practice. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes key findings from the literature alongside clinical experience in psychiatric emergency care. Core domains include conceptual definitions, functions of self-harm, suicide risk assessment, and acute management strategies. Results: Self-harm behaviors frequently serve multiple intrapersonal and interpersonal functions, including emotional regulation, anti-dissociative mechanisms, and crisis communication. Suicide risk assessment should move beyond static risk factor models and incorporate dynamic elements such as intent, planning, ambivalence, and protective factors, including reasons for living. In emergency settings, management should prioritize therapeutic engagement, emotional validation, and collaborative decision-making. The distinction between acute and chronic risk is critical for appropriate disposition, including hospitalization versus outpatient management. Conclusions: Effective management of suicidal and self-harm behaviors in emergency contexts requires an integrative, patient-centered approach that combines structured assessment with clinical judgment. Emphasis on therapeutic alliance and individualized care planning may improve outcomes beyond traditional risk stratification models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.