ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Psychological decoupling in responses to AI: emotional reactivity and behavioral discourse in digital environments.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly visible in digitally mediated environments, raising important questions about how users express emotional reactions to perceived AI presence. While prior research has frequently examined AI acceptance, trust, and behavioral outcomes, less is known about how different forms of AI perception are reflected in large-scale user-generated discourse. This study investigates the relationship between multidimensional AI perception, emotional expression, trust-related discourse, and purchase-related discourse in naturalistic online environments. Methods: A large-scale dataset consisting of 2,326,781 cleaned YouTube comments collected from 8,947 videos and 5,176 channels was analyzed. AI perception was operationalized through six categories: automation perception, robotic communication style, scriptedness, lack of authenticity, perceived artificiality, and uncanny valley perception. The analytical pipeline combined LLM-assisted weak supervision, transformer-based classification, manual validation, sentiment analysis, and statistical association tests to examine emotional expression and discourse patterns across AI perception categories. Results: AI perception was highly prevalent throughout the dataset and was strongly associated with negative emotional expression. Comments containing AI perception cues exhibited substantially higher levels of negative sentiment than comments without such cues. Emotional expression varied meaningfully across AI perception categories, with robotic communication style, lack of authenticity, automation perception, and uncanny valley perception showing the highest levels of negative expression. In contrast, trust-related discourse and purchase-related discourse remained rare across the corpus and displayed only limited differentiation across AI perception conditions. These findings indicate that emotional expression is considerably more visible and differentiated than explicit behavioral discourse in AI-related user comments. Discussion: The findings support a pattern of expressive decoupling, whereby perceived AI presence is strongly reflected in emotional expression while explicit trust-related and purchase-related discourse remains sparse. Rather than indicating actual behavioral outcomes, the results suggest that AI-related perceptions primarily manifest as discursive emotional reactions within AI-saturated digital environments. The study contributes to digital mental health and human-AI interaction research by demonstrating how large-scale user-generated discourse can reveal psychologically meaningful patterns of emotional expression associated with perceived AI presence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.