ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
A prospective descriptive cohort study of women aged ≥40 years conceiving through IVF at a tertiary care center.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with advanced maternal age (AMA) conceiving through Methods: A single-center prospective observational study was conducted between January and December 2024. All women aged 40 and older who conceived via IVF were included. Participants underwent regular prenatal follow-up in a maternal-fetal unit, including standardized maternal clinical assessment and fetal ultrasound evaluation. A subgroup analysis (40-44-year-old subgroup vs. ≥45-year-old subgroup) was also conducted to identify potential differences in obstetric and perinatal outcomes within our study population. Results: A total of 128 pregnant women were included. Nearly half were primigravid ( Conclusions: In this cohort of women of AMA following IVF, several obstetric and neonatal complications were observed. Additionally, the subgroup analysis revealed that PPROM, preterm IUGR and preterm delivery, lower neonatal weight and respiratory complications were significantly more frequent among women aged 45 or older. These findings provide descriptive clinical data regarding pregnancies in this specific population, which remains relatively underrepresented in the literature. Given the single-center design of the study, further research, including studies with appropriate comparison groups and larger sample size conducted across multiple centers, are needed to better clarify the individual and combined contributions of AMA and IVF to these outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.