ArticleCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2026
The Practice of Extubation Readiness Testing in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Units: A Cross-sectional Study Based on an Electronic Survey.
Article in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Shallow Breathing Index as a Predictor of Extubation Outcomes After Pediatric Cardiac Surgeries.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Extubation Failure after Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation in children with congenital heart disease is associated with increased morbidity. Although early extubation may reduce complications, the risk of extubation failure requires reliable assessment before extubation. This study explores current periextubation practices in pediatric cardiac intensive care units. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among pediatric cardiac intensive care unit providers globally in a virtual environment, using email. Results: A total of 169 providers responded with a response rate of 16.7% (169 of 1009), predominantly from North America (110 of 134, 82%) and primarily physicians (127 of 167, 76%). Only 22.3% (37 of 166) consistently use a validated sedation scale, whereas 39.8% (66 of 166) did not use one. Tracheal secretions were assessed by 90.4% (151 of 167), with 60% (100 of 166) delaying extubation due to significant secretions. An air leak test was routinely performed by 75.4% (126 of 167), and 78.7% (129 of 164) administered dexamethasone when leak was absent. A spontaneous breathing trial was regularly performed by 43.7% (73 of 167), most using continuous positive airway pressure with pressure support (137 of 166, 82.5%), typically once daily for 30-60 minutes. High-flow nasal cannula was the most commonly used noninvasive support method (147 of 160, 91.9%). Most providers defined extubation failure as reintubation within 24 or 48 hours. Providers were more likely to report a spontaneous breathing trial if they worked in transplant centers or if the patients had single-ventricle physiology. Conclusions: This study highlights notable differences in how extubation readiness is assessed and managed across institutions. Although guidelines exist and multiple collaborative efforts have been undertaken to standardize extubation readiness testing protocols, notable variability remains. The impact of this variability on clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.