Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422407›Full record

ArticleNeuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press)2025

Venous Sinus Stenting Outcomes in Patients with Papilledema from Secondary Causes of Elevated Intracranial Pressure.

Vishal B Swaminathan, Kafayat A Oyemade, Timothy T Xu, Jeremy K Cutsforth-Gregory, Giuseppe Lanzino, Heather E Moss, Robert L Dodd, M Tariq Bhatti, Waleed Brinjikji, Deena A Tajfirouz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vishal B SwaminathanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kafayat A OyemadeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA.
Timothy T XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jeremy K Cutsforth-GregoryDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Giuseppe LanzinoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Heather E MossDepartment of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Robert L DoddDepartments of Neurological Surgery and Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
M Tariq BhattiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente-Northern California. Roseville, CA.
Waleed BrinjikjiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Deena A TajfirouzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kevin D ChodnickiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
John J ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has recently emerged as a promising intervention in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) who fail medical therapy. Less is known on outcomes of VSS to manage papilledema from secondary causes of increased intracranial pressures (ICP), such as venous sinus thrombosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of VSS for four patients with papilledema from secondary causes of elevated ICP. A subset of 25 consecutive IIH patients with equivalent degrees of papilledema who underwent VSS served as a comparison group. Of the four patients with secondary causes of papilledema, three had increased ICP due to venous sinus thrombosis and one following surgical treatment of a spinal CSF-venous fistula. The median papilledema grade in patients with secondary causes of elevated ICP was 3.75 (range 3-4) at baseline, with only one (25%) having a significant sustained improvement in papilledema after VSS (overall post-stent median papilledema grade 2.5, range 0-3.5). In comparison, all 25 patients with IIH and grade ≥3 papilledema at baseline (median 4, range 3-5) had improvement of papilledema at least to grade 1 (median 1, range 0-1) at 3-month follow-up (p=0.003 for secondary causes vs IIH). Three (75%) patients with secondary causes of elevated ICP and four (16%) IIH patients required additional procedures for residual raised intracranial pressure after initial VSS (p=0.034). This study suggests that secondary causes of raised ICP may respond less to VSS than IIH patients with similar degrees of papilledema.

Indexed as

Idiopathic intracranial hypertensionPapilledemaVenous sinus stenting

Identifiers

PMID42422407
PMCPMC13344489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.