ArticleBiology of sport2026
Effects of different full squat training volumes matched for fatigue on strength gains, neuromuscular adaptations, and muscle hypertrophy.
Article in Biology of sport, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the effects of three full squat (SQ) training volumes, matched for fatigue, on jump performance, muscle strength, neuromuscular adaptations, and muscle hypertrophy. Thirty-six resistance-trained men were randomized into three groups: low (LOW), moderate (MOD), and high (HIG) volume. All groups trained SQ twice a week, with relative intensities increasing from 70% to 85% 1RM over the 8-week training period. The total volume accumulated was 48, 144, and 312 repetitions for LOW, MOD, and HIG, respectively, during the 16 training sessions. To isolate the effect of training volume by minimizing fatigue accumulation across repetitions, short rest periods were inserted between repetitions. The following tests were performed: 1) cross-sectional area (CSA) of vastus lateralis; 2) countermovement jump (CMJ); 3) maximal isometric SQ contraction; 4) progressive loading SQ test; and 5) fatigue SQ test. MOD achieved the greatest gains in the progressive loading SQ test ("group-by-time" interaction: p = 0.02, effect sizes (ES): 0.87, 2.52, and 1.12, for LOW, MOD, and HIG, respectively). HIG showed the greatest increases in the electromyography amplitude during this test ("group-by-time" interaction: p = 0.03, ES: -0.13, 0.52, and 0.88, for LOW, MOD, and HIG). All groups showed significant increases in CSA, without significant differences between them ("group-by-time" interaction: p = 0.34, ES: 0.52, 0.41, and 0.56, for LOW, MOD, and HIG). Short inter-repetition rest periods enabled all training volumes to induce significant hypertrophy, while moderate volumes optimized strength gains and high volumes maximized neuromuscular activation, highlighting volume-specific adaptations in SQ training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.