Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422380›Full record

ArticleBiology of sport2026

Technical and tactical performance of major Asian professional football leagues: a comparative analysis of 14,115 matches across six seasons.

Liangzhu Feng, Yanlong Chen, Zhe Cheng, Hongyou Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sport, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liangzhu FengResearch Center of Sports Performance Analysis, School of Physical Education & Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanlong ChenGuangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China.
Zhe ChengZhujiang Middle school, Guangzhou, China.
Hongyou LiuResearch Center of Sports Performance Analysis, School of Physical Education & Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify cross-league differences in technical and tactical performance across Asian professional football leagues. Statistics of 14,115 matches from the 2015-2020 seasons of the Chinese Super League (CSL), J League 1 (J1), K League 1 (K1), Saudi Professional League (SPL), Qatar Stars League (QSL), and UAE Arabian Gulf League (AGL) were collected and analysed. Generalised mixed linear modelling was used to estimate mean league differences in 57 match performance-related parameters while controlling for game result, match location, and team and opponent strength. Results showed that differences in offensive outcome and performance-related parameters were generally trivial across leagues (ES ≤ 0.2). In contrast, possession- and progression-related parameters exhibited substantial between-league differences, with J1 demonstrating higher passing frequency and ball progression parameters than the other leagues (ES = 0.36-0.91). Conversely, SPL, CSL, QSL, and AGL recorded higher frequencies of defensive and disciplinary actions, including fouls and yellow cards, compared with J1 and K1 (ES = 0.46-1.33). Hence, it is concluded that technical and tactical performance is generally similar across major Asian professional football leagues, but notable stylistic differences remain. J1 tends to exhibit a possession-oriented and structured playing style, whereas SPL, CSL, QSL, and AGL are characterised by greater physical intensity and more confrontational play. These insights may inform performance analysis and coaching strategies across Asian professional football.

Indexed as

Asian footballContextual variablesCross-league comparisonMatch analysisSport performance

Identifiers

PMID42422380
PMCPMC13343285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.