ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2026
'Making the Implicit Explicit': The Recommended Steps of a Caesarean Section, a Delphi Study Among South African Experts.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 'Making the Implicit Explicit': The Recommended Steps of a Caesarean Section, a Delphi Study Among South African Experts.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: In low- and middle-income countries, including South Africa, caesarean section (CS)-associated maternal complications, some of which are attributed to lack of skill and training, are of concern. The performing and teaching of CSs are not standardised in South Africa. This study aimed to identify the comprehensive steps, including those that are implicit, of a CS, according to South African experts. Methods: A modified three-round Delphi survey method was used. The steps were divided into preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. Invitations were sent to South African obstetric experts for voluntary participation. The aimed sample size was 15, and consensus was reached according to the confidence intervals (CIs) calculated from the Likert scale results. For the first two rounds, a seven-point Likert scale was used. In round three, only steps that had not reached consensus yet were presented to the panel as essential, substeps or excluded. Results: Invitations were sent to 44 experts: 28 (64%) completed round one, 20 (45%) round two and 19 (43%) round three. Sixty-six steps were identified after three rounds: 9 essential/14 substeps preoperatively, 14 essential/15 substeps intraoperatively and 5 essential/9 substeps postoperatively. Conclusion: South African obstetric experts recommended 66 steps for performing a CS. This comprehensive list could contribute to the standardisation and training of CSs, which may help increase the safety and quality of CSs, especially in low- and middle-income settings where junior doctors perform most of these surgeries, often without supervision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.