Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422371›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2026

'Making the Implicit Explicit': The Recommended Steps of a Caesarean Section, a Delphi Study Among South African Experts.

Liesl de Waard, Rozemiek Neline Hannelore Wessels, Anke Heitkamp, Thomas van den Akker, G S Gebhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liesl de WaardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Parow, South Africa, sun.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9582-7825
Rozemiek Neline Hannelore WesselsAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands, vu.nl.
Anke HeitkampDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands, uva.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-1950
Thomas van den AkkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands, unicamp.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-9145
G S GebhardtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Parow, South Africa, sun.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8999-8193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: In low- and middle-income countries, including South Africa, caesarean section (CS)-associated maternal complications, some of which are attributed to lack of skill and training, are of concern. The performing and teaching of CSs are not standardised in South Africa. This study aimed to identify the comprehensive steps, including those that are implicit, of a CS, according to South African experts. Methods: A modified three-round Delphi survey method was used. The steps were divided into preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. Invitations were sent to South African obstetric experts for voluntary participation. The aimed sample size was 15, and consensus was reached according to the confidence intervals (CIs) calculated from the Likert scale results. For the first two rounds, a seven-point Likert scale was used. In round three, only steps that had not reached consensus yet were presented to the panel as essential, substeps or excluded. Results: Invitations were sent to 44 experts: 28 (64%) completed round one, 20 (45%) round two and 19 (43%) round three. Sixty-six steps were identified after three rounds: 9 essential/14 substeps preoperatively, 14 essential/15 substeps intraoperatively and 5 essential/9 substeps postoperatively. Conclusion: South African obstetric experts recommended 66 steps for performing a CS. This comprehensive list could contribute to the standardisation and training of CSs, which may help increase the safety and quality of CSs, especially in low- and middle-income settings where junior doctors perform most of these surgeries, often without supervision.

Indexed as

caesarean deliverycaesarean sectioncaesarean section stepscaesarean section trainingsafe caesarean section

Identifiers

PMID42422371
PMCPMC13342840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.