ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Detection of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury and Prediction of Sensory Recovery.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detection of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury and Prediction of Sensory Recovery.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury by using current perception threshold (CPT) detection, electrical pulp test (EPT), and two-point discrimination (2PD). This is a retrospective cohort study conducted to explore the prognostic value of the above three detection methods for sensory recovery of IAN injury. Materials and Methods: A total of 72 patients with unilateral IAN injury following mandibular third molar extraction were included in this retrospective cohort study. The visual analog scale (VAS), CPT, EPT, and 2PD tests were performed on patients, and the values on the healthy and affected sides of the three tests were compared and the correlation with prognosis was analyzed. Results: During the follow-up, 56 patients were classified into the recovery group, with an average recovery time of (3.7 ± 1.2) months and 16 patients were set as the non-recovery group. The differences in CPT, EPT, and 2PD between the healthy and affected sides of all patients were statistically significant (all Conclusion: CPT, EPT, and 2PD can all evaluate whether there is IAN injury. The values measured at 5 Hz of CPT and posterior teeth EPT can evaluate the prognosis of nerve recovery, and the corresponding exploratory cut-off values (CPT Δ40, EPT Δ9) have good diagnostic performance for prognostic judgment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.