Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422342›Full record

ArticleWetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)2026

A Soil Bulk Density Metric to Improve Rapid Assessment of Wetland Condition.

Katie Hossler, James Tyler Retherford, Mitchell Link

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katie HosslerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy, Dayton, OH 45435 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2651-8505
James Tyler Retherford *Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy, Dayton, OH 45435 USA.
Mitchell Link *Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy, Dayton, OH 45435 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid wetland assessments are designed to require minimal field effort (e.g. half-day site visit), but still provide critical information on wetland ecological condition and functioning. Many wetland functions occur within or are supported by the soil, yet soil condition is seldom-or only minimally-included in most state rapid assessments. We focus on the Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for wetlands (ORAM) and evaluate soil bulk density as an indicator of wetland soil condition that can be incorporated into rapid wetland assessments. Soil bulk density ([Formula: see text]) is relatively easy to measure and requires only basic instrumentation. It also correlates well with more intensive metrics of soil condition (e.g. carbon content, aggregation). We sampled 45 wetlands in west-central Ohio, that exhibited a range of wetland type and ecological condition. From each wetland, we collected five soil cores (to 15-cm depth) and then analyzed the soil samples for [Formula: see text], carbon content, and water-stable aggregates. These three measurements were used to develop a four-bin [Formula: see text] metric of soil condition. Incorporating this metric into the current ORAM improved relationships with [Formula: see text] ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9.

Indexed as

Soil bulk densitySoil healthWetland assessmentWetland quality

Identifiers

PMID42422342
PMCPMC13341704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.