Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422334›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026

Wound Dressing and Postoperative Complications Following Breast Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 250 Patients.

Steven L Zeng, Thomas Ren, Ricardo R Colon, Nina E Ringelman, Salman Choudhry, Gedge Rosson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas Ren
Ricardo R Colon
Nina E Ringelman
Salman Choudhry
Gedge Rosson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative wound dressings are routine but understudied in reduction mammaplasty. Although an ideal dressing should promote healing, limit infection, and be well-tolerated, practice varies widely without consensus. Objectives: This study compares the impact of dressings on postoperative outcomes following reduction mammaplasty. Methods: A single-institution, retrospective review was performed of reduction mammaplasty patients. Data included demographics, operative details, dressing type, and complications. Dressings included Dermabond (DER), Prineo (PRI), Histoacryl (HIS), Sylke (SYL), Steri-Strips (STE), and combinations (COM). Contralateral breasts in oncoplastic or free-flap cases were excluded. Results: A total of 250 patients (439 breasts) were included. At baseline, cohorts differed in BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologist class, diabetes, operative time, and resection weight (all Conclusions: Dressing selection may affect wound outcomes after reduction mammaplasty. SYL tape was associated with lower rates of skin reaction and dehiscence across both analyses, although potentially limited by residual confounding. PRI's association with reoperation and poor scarring is notable but difficult to disentangle from patient selection bias. Combination dressings showed lower skin reaction rates but were heterogeneous, making interpretation challenging. Prospective data are needed to confirm these findings. Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic: For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Identifiers

PMID42422334
PMCPMC13345376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.