Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422290›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Antibacterial cellulose composite: using SET-LRP for cellulose surface modification with quaternized poly-dimethylammoniumethylacrylate.

Enguerrand Barba, J Benedikt Mietner, Dhanya Raveendran, Benedikt Sochor, Sarathlal Koyiloth Vayalil, Calvin Tu, Christel Vollstedt, Wolfgang Streit, Stephan V Roth, Julien R G Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Enguerrand BarbaInstitute of Wood Science, Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany julien.navarro@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1642-0632
J Benedikt MietnerInstitute of Wood Science, Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany julien.navarro@uni-hamburg.de.
Dhanya RaveendranInstitute of Wood Science, Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany julien.navarro@uni-hamburg.de.
Benedikt SochorDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Notkestrasse 85 22607 Hamburg Germany.
Sarathlal Koyiloth VayalilDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Notkestrasse 85 22607 Hamburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3483-3310
Calvin TuInstitute of Plant Sciences and Microbiology, Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany.
Christel VollstedtInstitute of Plant Sciences and Microbiology, Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany.
Wolfgang StreitInstitute of Plant Sciences and Microbiology, Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7617-7396
Stephan V RothDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Notkestrasse 85 22607 Hamburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6940-6012
Julien R G NavarroInstitute of Wood Science, Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany julien.navarro@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-6190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to graft quaternized poly-dimethylammoniumethylacrylate (PDMAEAQ) onto the surface of cellulose in order to both increase its compatibility with a PVC matrix and provide it with antibacterial properties. Cellulose was first prepared by grafting 2-bromoisobutyric acid to its surface to make it into an initiator for Single Electron Transfer Living Radical Polymerization (SET-LRP), which was then performed using dimethylaminoethylacrylate (DMAEA) as the monomer. The DMAEA units were then quaternized using 1-bromododecane. The resulting product was finally compounded with PVC. The antibacterial properties of the composites were studied, showing antibacterial activity against several bacterial test strains. Then, the modified cellulose/matrix compatibility and basic information on the composite were obtained using SAXS, and water contact angle measurements were used to explain the increased compatibility. Finally, the 3D printability of both PVC and the modified cellulose/PVC composite was tested, showing that, while PVC poses significant challenges for printing, a composite using another matrix would have great potential for everyday applications.

Identifiers

PMID42422290
PMCPMC13343542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.