Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422231›Full record

ArticleStatistica Sinica2026

Global Group Testing and Screening With Dynamic Effects.

Ying Cui, Limin Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistica Sinica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying CuiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University.
Limin PengDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University.

Funding

Method Development for Survival Dynamic Regression in Chronic Disease ResearchR01HL113548 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PENG, LIMIN · 2012 to 2021
$3.1M
Developing statistical analysis and prediction tools for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in hospitalized patients with diabetesR01DK136023 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Limin Peng · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113548NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK136023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying outcome-related variables is of general research interest in biomedical research. This task can be complicated by the presence of dynamic (or varying) variable effects that often manifest meaningful scientific mechanisms. Appropriately accounting for possible dynamic effects is crucial to avoid depreciating some important variables. In this work, we propose a model-free testing and screening framework by adopting a global view pertaining to the concept of interval quantile independence. The new framework not only permits robust identification of variables dynamically associated with an outcome, but also offers the flexibility to perform group testing that simultaneously evaluates multiple continuous or discrete covariates. We show that the key testing strategy can naturally evolve into unconditional and conditional screening procedures for ultra-high dimensional settings that enjoys the desirable sure screening property. We demonstrate good practical utility of the proposed methods via extensive simulation studies and a real application to a microarray data set.

Indexed as

Dynamic effectsHypothesis testingInterval quantile independenceVariable screening

Identifiers

PMID42422231
PMCPMC13345388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.