Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422224›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology advances2026

Universal Germline Genetic Testing in a Precision Oncology and Rare Cancer Clinic: Implementation and Outcomes.

Phebe Lemert, Hui-Zi Chen, Aditya Shreenivas, Kendra Eaves, Razelle Kurzrock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Phebe LemertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.ORCID 0000-0003-4133-4878
Hui-Zi ChenDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.ORCID 0000-0003-3744-883X
Aditya ShreenivasDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Duarte Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-8523-1523
Kendra EavesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Razelle KurzrockDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.ORCID 0000-0003-4110-1214

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Medical College of Wisconsin Lead Academic Participating Site RenewalUG1CA233198 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI William H Bradley, Elizabeth M Gore · 2019 to 2026
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for germline testing are complex and often miss patients with cancer susceptibility. We evaluated results of universal germline genetic testing in a Precision Medicine and Rare Cancer clinic, focusing on the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and the proportion of affected patients who would have been missed by NCCN guidelines, comparing patients with rare and common cancer.

methodsAll consenting patients with cancer seen at Froedtert Hospital's Precision Oncology and Rare Cancer clinic (June 2023 to January 2025; N = 120 patients; 55, common cancers, 65 rare cancers), who had not previously had germline testing, met with a clinic-embedded genetic counselor and underwent germline testing. Key variables included cancer type (rare

resultsThe positive rate for P/LP germline variants was 15% (n = 18; 13%, patients with common cancer; 17%, patients with rare cancer). Notably, 29% and 64%, respectively, of patients with positive common and rare cancer did not meet NCCN guidelines at the time of testing. Among patients with common and rare cancer with positive results, 83% and 42% of P/LP variants were in high/moderate penetrance genes (eg,

conclusionUniversal germline testing identified a substantial number of patients with clinically valuable germline variants, many of whom would be missed by NCCN guidelines, exposing guideline-based testing limitations. Overall, 50% of patients positive for germline variants did not meet NCCN testing criteria. A clinic-embedded genetic counselor facilitated testing and post-test counseling as part of a comprehensive cancer management approach. These findings emphasize the need for inclusive testing strategies to better identify cancer predisposition, including in rare cancers.

Identifiers

PMID42422224
PMCPMC13344466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.