ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Clinical and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-based prediction of ischemic stroke in cervical artery dissection.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is an important cause of ischemic stroke, yet early risk stratification remains challenging. This study aimed to identify clinical and high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging features associated with ischemic stroke and to develop a patient-level model for short-term risk prediction. Methods: A total of 129 patients with CeAD (148 dissected vessels) were retrospectively included. Baseline clinical data and HRMRI features were collected. At the vessel level, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for variable selection, followed by a mixed-effects logistic regression model to identify factors associated with ischemic events. At the patient level, representative vascular imaging features were integrated with clinical variables. LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression were applied to construct a nomogram for risk prediction. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Results: At the vessel level, white blood cell (WBC) count, intraluminal thrombus, severe stenosis or occlusion, and alcohol consumption were independently associated with ischemic events. At the patient level, multivariable analysis showed that WBC count, intraluminal thrombus, male sex, and alcohol consumption were independent predictors of ischemic stroke. The nomogram exhibited good discriminative ability, with an optimism-corrected area under the curve of 0.837 (95% CI: 0.810-0.852), along with satisfactory calibration and clinical net benefit. Conclusion: A patient-level model shows good performance in predicting ischemic stroke risk in patients with CeAD and may assist in early risk stratification and individualized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.