ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Long-term efficacy of neural circuit blockade for treating blepharospasm: a retrospective case series study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blepharospasm is a common symptom of Meige syndrome and often leads to functional blindness. Although current treatment options, such as oral medications, botulinum toxin injections, resection of periocular muscles, and deep brain stimulation, are available, no definitive method effectively eliminates blepharospasm. Objective: To address this unmet need, we developed a novel approach-neural circuit blockade (NCB). This study aimed to analyse its long-term efficacy for blepharospasm. Methods: NCB eliminates trigeminal nerve stimulation by facial expression muscles, reducing the production and input of sensory information, weakening feedback-based and plastic motor information functions, decreasing orbicularis oculi muscle tension, and alleviating blepharospasm. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 570 patients who underwent NCB treatment, with a median postoperative follow-up of 51 months. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by comparing preoperative and postoperative scores on the Shorr blepharospasm grading scale, Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS-M), and Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI). Results: Based on the Shorr grading scale, preoperatively, 97.9% of patients were grade 4, whereas 2.1% were grade 3. Postoperatively, 87.5% achieved complete remission (grade 0), whereas 7.4, 3.7, 0.9, and 0.5% were grades 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Pre- and postoperative BFMDRS-M scores significantly differed: eye (8.0 vs. 0.0), mouth (3.0 vs. 0.0), speech/swallowing (3.0 vs. 2.0), neck (3.0 vs. 1.5), and total (8.0 vs. 0.0). BSDI scores also significantly differed pre- and postoperatively. The results indicate that NCB effectively alleviates blepharospasm and addresses the lack of a definitive treatment, without causing severe local or systemic complications such as facial paralysis. Conclusion: NCB can safely and effectively alleviate blepharospasm, improve quality of life, and demonstrate stable long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.