ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Anticipation strategies of motor control in children and adolescents with cerebellar pathologies and typical development: a dual task paradigm.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Besides ataxia, cerebellar pathologies are often associated with neuropsychological deficits, particularly in executive attention. The cerebellum is considered a key hub of the predictive brain network, interacting with prefrontal and parietal areas through the basal ganglia. Anticipating the sensory consequences of motor actions and comparing them with actual feedback supports feedforward control, improving coordination, processing speed, and reducing errors. It also contributes to integrating subcortical-cortical networks during dual-task conditions. We hypothesized that impaired anticipatory strategies contribute to motor control deficits in cerebellar patients. Specifically, fine upper-limb motor control would worsen when combined with concurrent neuropsychological and cerebellar tasks (verbal anticipation and timing), compared with a working memory task or a single motor task. Therefore, we aimed to investigate dual-task abilities in cerebellar patients. Method: In total, 24 participants affected by cerebellar pathologies (mean age was 13y 1 m; 16 females) and 24 participants with typical development (mean age was 13y 1 m; 14 females) were required to execute a single visuo-motor precision task (single task condition) alone and with concurrent verbal anticipation, verbal timing, and verbal nBack tasks. Execution time and accuracy were analyzed as dependent variables combined in a single index [Inverse Efficacy, IE = RT/(1-pE)] and separately. Results: The results showed that the dual-task condition negatively affects the fine motor control of the upper limb in the two groups. A significant negative effect of the anticipation task was found for both the cerebellar and control groups. The cerebellar group presented a significant negative effect on the nBack task as well. Discussion: The results are consistent with the models describing the cerebellum as a key hub in anticipatory control, probably through predictive network synchronization. The anticipatory control is a damaged component in the control deficit of cerebellar patients. Finally, the cerebellar role in synchronizing the different cerebral networks involved in dual-task processing is strengthened. This study underlines the crucial role of anticipatory and feedforward mechanisms in motor control of both typically developed children and those with cerebellar pathologies and defines the importance of predictive neuropsychological skills in cognitive and motor fluidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.