Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422192›Full record

ArticleFree neuropathology2026

Expansion microscopy of banked brain tissue.

Andrew T McKenzie, Alicia Keberle, Andria Slaughter, Macy Garrood, Ons M'Saad, Jonathan Gulcicek, Ouzéna Bouadi, John F Crary, Kurt Farrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Free neuropathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew T McKenzieApex Neuroscience, Salem, USA.
Alicia KeberleApex Neuroscience, Salem, USA.
Andria SlaughterApex Neuroscience, Salem, USA.
Macy GarroodApex Neuroscience, Salem, USA.
Ons M'Saadpanluminate Inc., New Haven, USA.
Jonathan Gulcicekpanluminate Inc., New Haven, USA.
Ouzéna Bouadipanluminate Inc., New Haven, USA.
John F CraryFriedman Brain Institute, Departments of Pathology, Neuroscience, and Artificial Intelligence & Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Kurt FarrellFriedman Brain Institute, Departments of Pathology, Neuroscience, and Artificial Intelligence & Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expansion microscopy (ExM) physically enlarges biological specimens to enable ultrastructural imaging with conventional fluorescence microscopes. However, its performance in postmortem human brain tissue is unclear. Here, we evaluated how a previously established ExM protocol performs on cortical tissue from eight banked brains with postmortem intervals ranging from 40 minutes to 91 hours, and compared these data with electron microscopy (EM) on a subset of matched samples. Both techniques revealed similar patterns of ultrastructural features, including irregular, rounded, unstained spaces as postmortem artifacts that increased with longer postmortem intervals. While EM provided superior resolution for synaptic details, ExM enabled more high-throughput volumetric imaging of neural circuits. ExM also enabled molecular annotation of ultrastructure through immunofluorescence, as demonstrated by SMI-312 neurofilament and γ-protocadherin labeling. Our findings show that ExM can visualize aspects of ultrastructure in routinely banked brain tissue. While EM provides better resolution for fine synaptic detail, ExM offers a complementary approach that combines nanoscale imaging with molecular specificity and more accessible high-throughput volumetric capabilities.

Indexed as

Brain bankingExpansion microscopyNeurofilamentPostmortem changesUltrastructural qualityγ-protocadherin

Identifiers

PMID42422192
PMCPMC13344129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.