Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422172›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sleep2026

The return to normal life: sleep, anxiety upon awakening, and nightmares following the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Inigo Saez-Uribarri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Inigo Saez-UribarriIndependent Researcher, Sopela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The return to normal life following the COVID-19 pandemic was evaluated in terms of anxiety upon awakening, sleep quality indicators, and dream characteristics. Methods: The sample comprised 394 women and 107 men who completed an online self-report questionnaire between August 15, 2022, and December 8, 2022 about their sleep and dream experience from the previous night. Respondents completed the Anxiety upon Awakening Assessment Questionnaire (CEAD, as per the Spanish acronym) and evaluated their experiences of the pandemic. The data were compared to those obtained before the pandemic and those collected during lockdown in a previous study. Results: After the return to normal life, 46.5% of respondents recalled at least one dream scene, and nightmares were recorded in 4.6% of cases. This percentage did not differ significantly from those observed during lockdown or before the pandemic. Compared with the previous periods, participants also reported more dreams with anxious content and greater dream recall. A return to a sleep duration of between 6 and 7 h was observed. However, anxiety upon awakening was higher, suggesting that full normalization had not yet occurred at the time of this study. Conclusion: In this sample, nightmare frequency was less sensitive than anxiety upon awakening to post-pandemic sleep-related emotional activation. The findings may be compatible with emotional-processing accounts of dreaming and with a homeostatic interpretation of sleep in which emotional dream content did not translate into more awakenings.

Indexed as

COVID-19dream contentemotional processingmental healthmorning anxietynightmarespost-pandemic recoverysleep quality

Identifiers

PMID42422172
PMCPMC13342196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.