ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2025
Delay to ICA for patients with NSTEMI admitted to hospitals without cardiac catheterisation facilities in SE Scotland.
Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Correspondence: Delays to invasive coronary angiography in NSTE-ACS: insights from a tertiary PCI centre and the case for outpatient virtual wards.The British journal of cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends routine early inpatient invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for patients presenting with non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome (NSTEMI-ACS) within 72 hours of hospital admission. For patients admitted to hospitals without invasive cardiac facilities, completing interhospital transfer and investigation within this timeframe is challenging. This retrospective cohort study evaluated factors influencing time to ICA, diagnosis and treatment allocation decisions in 4,087 NSTEMI-ACS patients referred from five district general hospitals to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh over four years. The mean time from admission to coronary angiography was 5.0 ± 3.0 days, with the majority waiting longer than the 72-hour NICE target. Admission towards the end of the week, defined as Wednesday to Saturday, was associated with longer delay. Coronary revascularisation was not required in 34% of patients. The presence of obstructive coronary disease and use of coronary revascularisation varied with age and sex, with younger female patients more likely to have normal coronary arteries or mild non-obstructive plaque disease. Use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) varied with supervising consultant operator. These findings highlight disparity between clinical practice and NICE guideline recommendations for NSTEMI-ACS patients admitted to hospitals without invasive cardiac facilities, and highlight the need for the development of treatment pathways that reduce delay and better identify patients who will benefit from coronary revascularisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.