Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422147›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2025

Delay to ICA for patients with NSTEMI admitted to hospitals without cardiac catheterisation facilities in SE Scotland.

Man Hei Marcus Kam, Reagan Lee, Brayden Zheng Lin Ng, David Gringras, Joseph Coong, Brian Moosa, Lynn Wood, Sara Bamford, Nicholas L M Cruden, Rong Bing and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Man Hei Marcus KamYear 6 Medical Student, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB.
Reagan LeeYear 6 Medical Student, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB.
Brayden Zheng Lin NgYear 6 Medical Student, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB.
David GringrasYear 6 Medical Student, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB.
Joseph CoongYear 6 Medical Student, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB.
Brian MoosaYear 6 Medical Student, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB.
Lynn WoodSenior Cardiac Liaison Nurse, Edinburgh Heart Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA.
Sara BamfordSenior Cardiac Liaison Nurse, Edinburgh Heart Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA.
Nicholas L M CrudenConsultant Cardiologist, Edinburgh Heart Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA.
Rong BingConsultant Cardiologist, Edinburgh Heart Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA.
Peter A HenriksenConsultant Cardiologist, Edinburgh Heart Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends routine early inpatient invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for patients presenting with non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome (NSTEMI-ACS) within 72 hours of hospital admission. For patients admitted to hospitals without invasive cardiac facilities, completing interhospital transfer and investigation within this timeframe is challenging. This retrospective cohort study evaluated factors influencing time to ICA, diagnosis and treatment allocation decisions in 4,087 NSTEMI-ACS patients referred from five district general hospitals to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh over four years. The mean time from admission to coronary angiography was 5.0 ± 3.0 days, with the majority waiting longer than the 72-hour NICE target. Admission towards the end of the week, defined as Wednesday to Saturday, was associated with longer delay. Coronary revascularisation was not required in 34% of patients. The presence of obstructive coronary disease and use of coronary revascularisation varied with age and sex, with younger female patients more likely to have normal coronary arteries or mild non-obstructive plaque disease. Use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) varied with supervising consultant operator. These findings highlight disparity between clinical practice and NICE guideline recommendations for NSTEMI-ACS patients admitted to hospitals without invasive cardiac facilities, and highlight the need for the development of treatment pathways that reduce delay and better identify patients who will benefit from coronary revascularisation.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromecoronary angiographyguidelinesmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID42422147
PMCPMC13344461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.