ArticleJournal of medical physics
Three-dimensional Hierarchically Dense U-net Architecture for Knowledge-based Dose Prediction in Head and Neck Radiotherapy.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Our objective is to investigate a novel knowledge-based planning model that utilizes the newly developed dense U-Net architecture to predict three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions in patients with head and neck cancer. Materials and Methods: We utilized data published by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Institute, which includes treatment plans for 340 patients with head and neck cancer who were treated using intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment with a prescribed dose of 70 Gy. The data were divided into three subsets, and the proposed dense U-Net was applied to predict full volumetric dose distributions. Model performance was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE) between predicted and clinical doses across all subsets. Results: The MAE between the reference and predicted dose distributions for the training, validation, and testing datasets was 1.60 Gy, 3.09 Gy, and 3.14 Gy, respectively. The mean absolute dose error was measured at 1.53 Gy in the brainstem, 3.43 Gy in the left parotid, 3.29 Gy in the right parotid, 2.05 Gy in the spinal cord, 2.40 Gy in the esophagus, 3.81 Gy in the mandible, 3.35 Gy in the larynx, 1.56 Gy in planning target volume (PTV70), 1.82 Gy in PTV63, 1.91 Gy in PTV56, and 3.14 Gy in the body contour for the testing data. The proposed framework enabled rapid generation of complete 3D dose distributions for each patient's plan in a few seconds, demonstrating strong potential to accelerate clinical workflows. Conclusion: The proposed dense U-Net model demonstrated proficiency in accurately predicting dose distributions for the head and neck region, ensuring consistent quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.