ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2026
Putting sport injury prevention into practice: a qualitative study in a small Western European high-income country.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite strong scientific evidence supporting sports injury prevention, implementation in real-world sport settings remains limited. Understanding how prevention is perceived and practised by those directly involved in sport is essential to ensure effective implementation. This qualitative study explored how injury prevention is perceived, practised and implemented within the sport ecosystem of a small Western European high-income country (Luxembourg). Semi-structured interviews were carried out across the Luxembourgish sport ecosystem, including athletes, coaches, healthcare professionals and institutional representatives. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached. Data were analysed inductively following grounded theory principles using ATLAS.ti, with open, axial and selective coding to develop core dimensions grounded in participants' experiences. 12 participants acknowledged the importance of injury prevention and shared a strong commitment to athlete health. However, prevention was often perceived as reactive, medicalised or disconnected from performance objectives, which limited sustained engagement. Participants emphasised the need to reframe prevention as a performance-enhancing and integral component of training rather than an additional constraint. Three key facilitators for effective implementation emerged: (1) clear and coordinated communication between stakeholders and institutions, (2) early integration of injury prevention in youth sport through engaging and age-appropriate approaches and (3) structured education and long-term support for coaches, who were identified as central gatekeepers of daily practice. Although Luxembourg's small size and close-knit networks were seen as opportunities for collaboration, fragmented structures and inconsistent communication currently hinder coherent implementation. Luxembourg offers a favourable context to embed injury prevention within sport culture, yet greater system-level coordination is required. Reframing prevention around performance, strengthening coach education, promoting early engagement and improving cross-institutional communication may enhance adherence and sustainability. These findings provide practical insights for other sport systems seeking to translate evidence-based injury prevention into effective field practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.