Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42422034›Full record

ArticleData in brief2026

(Global) single market for data? Exploring data cosmopolitanism as a solidarity-based regulatory approach to the european health data space.

Marta Musidlowska, Michiel Fierens, Isabela Maria Rosal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta MusidlowskaKULeuven, Centre for IT and IP Law, Leuven, Belgium.
Michiel FierensKULeuven, Centre for IT and IP Law, Leuven, Belgium.
Isabela Maria RosalKULeuven, imec, Centre for IT and IP Law, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Union (EU) is advancing an interoperable data governance framework through the establishment of Common European Data Spaces (CEDS), fostering innovation, economic competitiveness, and the provision of personalised services. Beyond these goals, CEDS seem to reflect ambitions of digital sovereignty and strategic autonomy in the global data economy, aiming to position itself among global leaders in Artificial Intelligence (AI) development and innovation. This article critically examines these ambitions through the recently adopted European Health Data Space Regulation (EHDSR), a flagship initiative establishing common mechanisms that enables secondary use of health data for research, innovation, and public health responses. The analysis highlights tensions between the EU's pursuit of autonomy and its foundational principles of solidarity and international cooperation, especially regarding engagement with non-EU countries. While Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) underpins its current data space legislation, it limits the EU's capacity to achieve broader geopolitical objectives. The paper advances the concept of "data cosmopolitanism" as an extension of the solidarity principle, proposing a theoretical framework for a global approach to health data sharing that incorporates societal values such as social justice and equality in access to healthcare.

Indexed as

Data cosmopolitanismData solidarityData spaceEuropean health data spaceGlobal data spacesInternal market

Identifiers

PMID42422034
PMCPMC13342972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.