ReviewInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2026
Chinese consensus on first-line precision therapy for advanced gastric cancer.
Review in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) remains a formidable public health challenge in China, characterized by a high incidence and mortality rate. A significant proportion of patients are diagnosed with advanced or metastatic disease, where traditional chemotherapy has historically offered limited survival benefits. However, driven by a deeper molecular understanding of GC heterogeneity, the paradigm of GC treatment is undergoing a revolutionary shift from a "one size fits all" approach toward precision medicine. The identification of predictive biomarkers, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ERBB2; MIM: 164870) expression, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status, PD-L1 (CD274; MIM: 605402) expression, and Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18; MIM: 609210) overexpression, has established biomarker-guided strategies as the unequivocal future direction for managing advanced GC. In particular, the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and agents targeting Claudin 18.2 has revolutionized the landscape of first-line (1L) treatment for GC. China has achieved accelerated breakthroughs in gastric cancer drug research and development, leading to more innovative therapies and improved diagnostic/treatment regimens, providing patients with more abundant and effective treatment options and significantly improving the landscape of diagnosis and treatment. Nevertheless, integrating complex biomarkers and novel agents into practice poses challenges, including inconsistencies in biomarker testing and the need for nuanced treatment regimen selection. Without standardized guidelines, inconsistent application may lead to suboptimal patient outcomes and inefficient use of healthcare resources. This expert consensus has been jointly formulated with the aim of further enhancing and standardizing the biomarker testing and precision medicine of 1L therapy for advanced GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.