ArticleStigma and health2026
Impact of policies on pregnant individuals using drugs: A narrative synthesis review of treatment, health care access, and outcomes.
Article in Stigma and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amid the opioid epidemic and racial disparities in maternal and child health, there is increasing interest from clinicians, patients, and policymakers in understanding how state policies impact pregnant individuals using drugs, particularly regarding healthcare access and outcomes. This narrative synthesis examines the types of policies affecting this population and their consequences on maternal and child health. Following PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 408 studies, selecting 28 relevant articles to assess the prevalence and effects of punitive laws targeting pregnant individuals using drugs. The review reveals an increase in punitive policies over time, such as considering substance use as child abuse, mandatory reporting with positive toxicology tests, and cannabis-related regulations, including restrictions on breastfeeding. However, the findings are mixed regarding neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and mandatory reporting. Some studies show a rise or decrease in NAS following punitive policy changes, while others suggest that such policy changes may lead to lower rates of provider reporting. The fear of being reported may discourage some pregnant individuals from seeking prenatal care due to increased stigma. Other studies report confusion about mandatory reporting procedures and providers' concerns about damaging patient trust. Policies sanctioning incarceration of pregnant individuals using substances also increase out-of-state births, potentially endangering both mothers and infants. This study highlights the harmful, unintended consequences of various policies and discusses interventions and future research directions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.