ArticleDigital health
Incremental domain adaptation-based ICU patient mortality prediction.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate prediction of ICU mortality based on physiological data can significantly facilitate timely interventions and improve patient outcomes. However, patient heterogeneity, including variations in age, disease types, and regional differences, along with the dynamic nature of ICU data, leads to significant limitations in the generalization ability and self-updating capability of existing prediction models. Therefore, developing dynamically adaptive predictive methods is crucial to ensure model adaptability and reliability in real-world clinical settings. Methods: We propose AdaICU, a novel framework that integrates unsupervised domain adaptation and incremental learning for cross-ICU mortality prediction. The framework first aligns feature distributions between source and target domains using domain-adversarial training, and subsequently updates the model through incremental learning as new target-domain data become available. Results: Extensive experiments on the PhysioNet 2012 dataset show that AdaICU consistently outperforms baseline models across multiple cross-domain settings. In particular, AdaICU achieves AUROC improvements of approximately 2-6% over the strongest baseline across different transfer tasks. Substantial improvements are also observed in AUPRC, indicating enhanced capability in identifying high-risk patients. In addition, AdaICU improves accuracy by approximately 4-8% and achieves higher positive predictive value, suggesting more reliable positive predictions. Overall, these results highlight the effectiveness of the proposed framework in addressing cross-domain distribution shifts. Conclusion: By jointly addressing cross-domain distribution shifts and post-deployment model adaptation, AdaICU provides a practical and effective framework for ICU mortality prediction in settings with limited labeled data. This capability makes it particularly promising for real-world application in dynamic clinical environments with evolving data distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.