ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Case report: Pediatric vascular Behçet's disease with prominent arterial involvement: a case series of five patients.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vascular Behçet's disease (VBD) rare and severe subtype of Behçet disease characterized by vascular inflammation. Its prevalence in the pediatric population is extremely low. This case series aims to delineate the clinical features and long-term outcomes of pediatric VBD to enhance clinical recognition and optimize management strategies. Case presentation: We retrospectively reviewed five pediatric patients with VBD, all of whom were female. Arterial involvement was universal, with a subset of patients exhibiting concurrent venous disease. All patients showed a favorable response to glucocorticoids combined with immunosuppressants or biologic agents. Clinical manifestations were dominated by mucocutaneous and systemic features, including erythema nodosum, oral ulcers, genital ulcers, persistent fever, and abdominal pain. Laboratory evaluation revealed elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate) in all cases. Vascular imaging confirmed the presence of vascular wall thickening and luminal stenosis. Colonoscopy at diagnosis identified multiple intestinal ulcers with surrounding mucosal hyperemia and edema in all five patients. "Clinical improvement" was defined as resolution of symptoms and normalized inflammatory markers; "resolution" meant complete disappearance of vascular lesions; "amelioration" meant ≥50% reduction in wall thickening or stenosis. During follow-up, all patients exhibited significant clinical improvement, with vascular lesions demonstrating resolution or significant amelioration on repeat imaging; intestinal ulcers healed in the four patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy. Conclusions: This pediatric case series highlights that VBD can affect vessels of various sizes and typically presents with a constellation of characteristic mucocutaneous and systemic symptoms. Early diagnosis and proactive vascular screening followed by combination immunosuppressive therapy were associated with favorable clinical and radiological outcomes. Causal conclusions cannot be drawn due to the lack of a control group. Increased awareness of this rare vasculopathy is critical for prompt intervention and improved patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.