ArticleNeurosurgery practice2026
Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Cohort Study.
Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesChronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a major public health issue in the United States. cSDH can present as unilateral or bilateral collections. We compared outcomes of surgically treated unilateral and bilateral cSDH and assessed factors contributing to retreatment.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study through chart review of patients operated for cSDH from 4 level 1 trauma centers, February 2009 to August 2021. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: (1) unilateral, operated cSDH; (2) bilateral, operated cSDH on both sides; and (3) bilateral cSDH, but only one side operated. Patients with middle meningeal artery embolization were excluded. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, radiological findings, and outcomes were collected. A multivariable logistic regression model assessed factors associated with retreatment.
resultsWe analyzed a total of 731 patients: 563 (77%) had unilateral operated cSDH; 132 (18%) had bilateral operated cSDH; and 36 (5%) had bilateral cSDH but were operated only on one side. We found no significant differences in retreatment rates between patients with bilateral, operated cSDH and those with unilateral, operated cSDH (14% vs 12%,
conclusionThere was no significant difference in retreatment, 30-day readmission, or 30-day mortality between unilateral and bilateral cSDHs treated surgically. Despite exclusion of bilateral cSDH from major recent clinical trials, their rates of recurrence are similar to unilateral cSDH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.