ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2026
From Zero-Shot to Bedside: A Practical Playbook for Adapting Open-Source Large Language Models to Clinical Symptom Extraction.
Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to clinical notes, but guidance on how to adapt open-source models to specific tasks and manage annotation quality at scale is limited. We present a playbook for fine-tuning LLMs on de-identified clinical notes from patients with pancreatic cancer, spanning both pre-diagnosis and on-treatment settings. We evaluate prompting strategies, contrast open-source models with GPT-4o, and explore disease-level versus task-specific adaptation. A key contribution is an LLM-assisted adjudication workflow in which models flag notes where predictions consistently conflict with initial human labels. This approach concentrated expert review on a small fraction of cases while identifying many true annotation errors, ultimately improving downstream model performance. We further examine the use of machine-generated annotations to augment limited expert labels, showing that balanced mixtures of synthetic and human data can enhance fine-tuned models. Our findings provide practical guidance for deploying open-source LLMs in clinical contexts, offering strategies to improve accuracy, reduce annotation burden, and enable privacy-preserving, site-adapted clinical natural language processing (NLP).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42421884PMC13345690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.