Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421849›Full record

ReviewRadiologia brasileira

Gramado consensus on imaging evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer.

Linei Augusta Brolini Delle Urban, Luciano Fernandes Chala, Ivie Braga de Paula, Beatriz Medicis Maranhão Miranda, Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt, Paula de Camargo Moraes, Ana Claudia Mendes Rodrigues Mussauer, Carla Cristina Teixeira Polimeni Benetti, Ana Claudia Silveira Racy, Lucio De Carli and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Linei Augusta Brolini Delle UrbanClínica de Diagnóstico Avançado por Imagem (DAPI), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-9776
Luciano Fernandes ChalaGrupo Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8469-4681
Ivie Braga de PaulaInstituto Orizonti de Longevidade e Saúde, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-6549
Beatriz Medicis Maranhão MirandaLucilo Maranhão Diagnósticos, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9085-2204
Almir Galvão Vieira BitencourtA.C.Camargo Câncer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0192-9885
Paula de Camargo MoraesGrupo Dasa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-9134-6064
Ana Claudia Mendes Rodrigues MussauerHospital São Vicente de Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-6578-1808
Carla Cristina Teixeira Polimeni BenettiBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4836-8053
Ana Claudia Silveira RacyHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4054-8236
Lucio De CarliHospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1682-113X
Bruna Maria ThompsonUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4295-1002
Henrique Lima CoutoRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3789-4461
Eduardo Carvalho PessoaUniversidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8330-0222
Nilceana Maya Aires FreitasHospital de Câncer Araújo Jorge, Goiana, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9445-8674
Daniel Fontes Santos de Teive E ArgoloGrupo Oncoclínicas, Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0009-4702-2002
Filomena Marino CarvalhoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5838-3636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is a critical pillar in defining the multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy in breast cancer. This consensus aimed to establish national guidelines for imaging assessment of NST, based on the best scientific evidence adapted to the Brazilian context. To this end, a panel of experts was formed, composed of breast radiologists, breast surgeons, oncologists, onco-radiotherapists and breast patholo-gists. The methodology was based on a systematic literature review, followed by face-to-face discussions and rounds of virtual voting (adapted Delphi method), defining consensus when agreement was =75%. As a result, radiological response criteria were standardized, and accuracy, false-negative, and positive rates were determined, as well as the role of mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and tomosynthesis, stratified by molecular subtypes. Additionally, recommendations were established for marking the breast lesion and axillary lymph nodes before the start of treatment. Finally, the role of other imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced mammography and pos-itron-emission tomography/computed tomography, was discussed, as well as the impact of artificial intelligence as tools for evaluating the response to SNRT.

Indexed as

breast magnetic resonance imaging;breast neoplasmimaging assessmentneoadjuvant systemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID42421849
PMCPMC13345094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.