Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421847›Full record

ArticleDiscover applied sciences2026

In production system for tool wear prediction using multi-sensor time series and machine learning models.

Jonathan Dreyer, Stefano Carrino, Hatem Ghorbel, Paul Cotofrei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover applied sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan DreyerHaute Ecole Arc Ingénierie, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Rue de la Serre, 7, 2610 Saint-Imier, Switzerland.
Stefano CarrinoHaute Ecole Arc Ingénierie, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Rue de la Serre, 7, 2610 Saint-Imier, Switzerland.
Hatem GhorbelHaute Ecole Arc Ingénierie, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Rue de la Serre, 7, 2610 Saint-Imier, Switzerland.
Paul CotofreiInformation Management Institute, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In micro-machining milling, optimizing the process is a major key to reducing production costs. By monitoring tool wear and detecting when the quality of the machining deteriorates, the process could be more accurately adjusted. The present research explores four approaches that use different machine learning models to predict machining tool wear during the milling process. The study is based on a dataset created from a face milling operation on stainless steel round (AISI 303) material. The workpiece used for the machining process is conceived as a set of multiple stairs shape in brass and is milled using a 3 mm tungsten carbide tool. Three different types of sensors-acoustic emission, accelerometers and axis currents-are set-up to measure the wear of the tool. The article provides a description of the different sensors used, and the dataset collected. The performance of the tool wear prediction is evaluated using the F1-score and a customized weighted expected value. The extra-trees classifier yields the optimal F1-score result of 73% when evaluated across the five classes, indicating its superior performance in comparison to other classifiers. Based on this best model, the implementation feasibility and the potential performance of an in-production system predicting machining tool wear is evaluated.

Indexed as

In productionMachine learningMilling machiningMulti-sensors time seriesTool wear monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42421847
PMCPMC13341891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.