ArticleVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2026
Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transduodenal endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a patient with a duodenal switch for complex stone management.
Article in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: A 69-year-old male patient with a previous duodenal switch surgery presented with choledocholithiasis and cholangitis. Initially, interventional radiology (IR) performed biliary stent placement with a metal stent left in situ. One year later, the patient presented again with cholangitis, now requiring definitive treatment via EUS-directed transduodenal ERCP (EDDE). Methods: An anastomosis was created between the first portion (superior portion) of the duodenum (D1) and the excluded second portion (descending portion) of the duodenum (D2) using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). After anastomosis maturation, the patient returned for ERCP and removal of the IR-placed stent. The previously placed stent initially could not be removed, so a metal stent was placed within the IR-placed stent for later removal via stent-in-stent technique. Three months later, the stents were removed, and the bile duct was swept with a balloon. Stones and debris were extracted from the duct. The duodenoduodenal LAMS was removed, leaving a patent fistula in place. Results: An EDDE was successfully performed between the D1 and D2 portions of the duodenal switch. The patient was asymptomatic and stent-free. Conclusions: The successful completion of this procedure indicates that it may be safe and effective to perform an EDDE in patients with duodenal switch anatomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.