ArticleJournal of behavioral and cognitive therapy2026
Assessing the psychometric properties of the 10-item version of the comprehensive assessment of ACT processes (CompACT) in a community-based adult sample.
Article in Journal of behavioral and cognitive therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Comprehensive Assessment of ACT Processes (CompACT) is a 23-item self-report measure of psychological flexibility with evidence of a three-factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and reliability. Several short-form CompACT versions, including 18-, 15-, and 10-item forms have been developed. The primary aim of this study was to compare the model fit of each short form and to further examine the convergent and discriminant validity and reliability of the best fitting model in an adult community-based sample in the United States. Method: Participants were recruited for the study via a Qualtrics participant panel. A total of 601 participants completed the CompACT and other self-report measures. Results: A series of confirmatory factor analyses indicated the 10-item version provided the best fit to the data. The 10-item CompACT demonstrated adequate reliability and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity with correlations in the expected direction with psychological distress, life satisfaction, mindfulness, and resilience, but not gender. Discussion: Despite limitations, these results suggest the 10-item CompACT is a valid and reliable measure of psychological flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.