ReviewThe Lancet. Primary care2026
The general practice workforce crisis in Europe: scale of the challenge and available policy responses.
Review in The Lancet. Primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic Deprivation, Primary Care Physician Workload and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Across Italian Regions: An Ecological Spatial Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection to2026
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
General practice across the European region faces a systemic workforce crisis that threatens patient access to health services as well as the coordination, continuity, and equity of care within European health systems. In this Health Policy paper, we use an analysis of the WHO/Europe-Eurostat-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Joint Questionnaire on Non-Monetary Health Care Statistics dataset for 43 countries, evidence from a dedicated research collection, and a rapid review of policy interventions to assess the scale, drivers, and solutions to general practitioner (GP) shortages. Although headcounts have increased since 2010, GP density has stagnated, and effective full-time equivalent capacity has declined due to ageing, early retirement, part-time work, migration, administrative burden, and private-sector competition. We argue that incremental responses are insufficient and propose a coordinated, lifecycle-based strategy spanning training, recruitment, retention, and late-career roles. Key actions include expanded training pathways, improved employment conditions, rural and return-migration incentives, expanded multidisciplinary teams, reduced administrative workload, and full-time equivalent-sensitive workforce monitoring linked to modernised funding and contracting. Tailored national implementation within a shared European framework will be essential to rebuild sustainable GP capacity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.