Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421758›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

David M Wright, Ilanit Trifonov, Marganit Shahar-Gonen, Anat Loewenstein, Dinah Zur, Tunde Peto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David M WrightCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Ilanit TrifonovOphthalmology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Marganit Shahar-GonenOphthalmology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Anat LoewensteinOphthalmology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Dinah ZurOphthalmology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tunde PetoCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop machine learning models using OCT fluid metrics to predict long-term anti-VEGF treatment intensity and visual acuity (VA) outcomes in 2 large clinical data sets of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Design: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study. Subjects: The study included a total of 2922 eyes from 2475 patients with nAMD treated at 2 tertiary centers in the United Kingdom (Belfast) and Israel (Tel Aviv Medical Center). Methods: Longitudinal clinical data and OCT scans obtained at baseline and 6 months after treatment initiation were analyzed using a validated deep learning algorithm to extract quantitative volumetric retinal fluid measurements. Machine learning ensemble models were trained using the Belfast data set to predict total anti-VEGF injections and absolute VA at 1, 2, and 3 years from treatment initiation. External validation was performed by applying the trained models to an independent cohort to assess generalizability across health care systems. Main Outcome Measures: Prediction accuracy for the total number of anti-VEGF injections and absolute VA at years 1 to 3 since treatment initiation, assessed by agreement with observed outcomes. Results: In the main cohort, prediction of total anti-VEGF injections was accurate, with 99.6%, 95.5%, and 97.1% of eyes predicted within 2 injections of observed values at years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Visual acuity predictions were within ≤0.2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units (≤2 ETDRS lines) for 92.5%, 73.5%, and 76.5% of eyes at the corresponding time points. In the external cohort, model performance was reduced, with 45.0% to 53.8% of injection predictions and 26.3% to 41.1% of VA predictions meeting accuracy thresholds. Subretinal fluid at 6 months was the primary driver of injection burden predictions, whereas intraretinal fluid was most influential for VA outcomes. Conclusions: Machine learning models based on automated fluid metrics can accurately predict treatment burden and VA outcomes within the clinical environment in which they are developed. Although performance declined with external validation, reflecting differences in treatment policies and health care systems, locally trained models remain clinically valuable. Early identification of high- and low-burden treatment trajectories may support individualized decision-making, patient counseling, and more efficient allocation of ophthalmology resources in the growing nAMD population. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Age-related macular degenerationAnti-VEGFMachine learningOCTVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID42421758
PMCPMC13343136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.